Sharing out the loot - a little problem on the logic

While I was traveling on the seas, here's a little problem on the logic. A little problem though modified, but relevant to the real case. Let's see how you cope with it.

The company of 4 people gathered pobuhat. The only money they did not have. But Bob fumbling through his pockets found 500 rubles, which he gave my mother for food, Peter - 100 rubles, the father of cigarettes, and Jack - 50 rubles coins. Once purchased, a bully Peter remembered that I should check for the botanist Oleg school a hundred rubles. And publicly announced that he was a booze did not have, and should Oleg. Next were the clearing zazvany girl dances obzhimantsy. rest.

In the morning all woke up with a headache. Eugene, as the most seasoned, collected bottles and handed them to the sum of 200 rubles. Then it all came together in a circle of friends to decide how to divide the money, so that no one was hurt. As Pete no one should and should Oleg, he said that the proceeds from the sale of bottles and the money is not intended to sebalsya Masha from a nearby entrance to the sea.

Since the only sober and overcame a hangover was Bob, he reasoned as follows:.
- Bob put 500 rubles, but it was not his grandmother and mother, and they must return the entire.
- Oleg and wife should be returned to Cash.
- 150 rubles on deposit bottles and return to Oleg 's wife, 50 rubles Bob takes himself, the other head ( duty to the mother Vasey ), divided equally, t. e. Each of the three must find 150 rubles until the evening.

T. e. He is to give the Vase $ 100 now and another 50 to bring the evening, Jack, respectively, 50 and 100 are then. Bob eventually receives all the bottles of 200 rubles and 150 rubles in the evening.

Then Oleg (typical nerd ), adjusted his glasses and said quietly:. ' Hera with two comrades, we are a fuck. Should not be considered. '.

Why did he say?.

Alice!

Just about the special effects and ' magic ' 3D: characters are well drawn, but the combination of characters, cartoons done in haste and often can be seen that the hero flees empty-handed, or communicates with the air, which then dorisovat cartoon. As for the 3D - it lacks depth and it is 3D - if the hero in the foreground, while the focus in the background, instead of the depth of the image will be blurred in the foreground and a clear second. So 3D pririsovannoe or after the shooting, or do not know that - but it never Avatar. In general, and the magical world of Wonderland is more like a painter's work - he is not alive or drops, horrible detail.

plot. If you read Carroll, you will realize how much mocked disneevtsy the book, leaving only the characters - the storyline is completely destroyed. Those who do not read, they just get bored. Let me remind you, the girl gets to Carroll's strange world and meets with different characters, the conversation that - that's half of the book, not to mention the wordplay. But in any case - this is a very fun trip, almost a game for the night a fairy tale told by a little girl. And not a nightmare.

In disneevtsev fun trip turned into a saga in the style of the Return of the King: a girl saves the kingdom from the Red dictator. Bueeee. It's very bleak. And the sad. Emo -history. Especially since the white queen - this is the real emo.

Mad Hatter never Jack Sparrow. Playing on the level, but no charisma. Partly because of the disastrous scenarios and Depp dropped his hands, the poor man simply does not understand how to play the stupidity and just hamming. So the five per game, perhaps, only the red queen.

What is good? . Mostly all the sweetly. There are a few characters, causing sympathy and making a movie is not so gloomy. Happy ending is, though, and very sugary. The heroes are drawn well, the other effects on the chetverochku.

A film for children - they love this movie with bright colors and not to understand the story line: something flickers on the screen and right. You can even go with beer. But then fly to Moscow because of this - it is not necessary. I think that next weekend will be 50 % drop. A pity. So much was expected.

---------------------------------.
Sign up. to update the blog with one click!. Read on Twitter!. ::. Advertising blog.

The Sorcerer's Apprentice

Begin with the typical Disney fairy tales seed. This type of stupid for kids to understand about what is actually a movie. There was a Merlin, and he had three students. Two of them began to suck each other, and the third was jealous, and contributed to the murder of Merlin, Morgana. Next was mesilovo, after which there was only one ( zashtampovav other dolls ), continually seeking student, Morgan finally able to bang.

Well, all. Next comes garripotter in Disney. A lot of magical transformations and all umklapp fireball. And the final battle with the boss - with Morgan. All the fun, and fast enough reckless. Action solves.

Casting is also very nice. And Molina as the main villain. And Cage ( nephew F. F. Coppola, by the way ) as the good guy. Even the main character looks tolerable, although wild ape, and voice is horrible. Frankly, the film makes Cage with Molina. The protagonist is more like a shit in the hole. And it is not sinking, and, in general, is almost useless. A sort of idiot sad sack with human emotions, all of which must show that there is something in this world more important than wave fayerbollov.

But it is useless to analyze a film. It is still more than a collection of beautiful and colorful scenes, which are sewn with white thread but strong enough. T. e. think about why Max ( evil sorcerer ) so recklessly wets other evil (I think that it was possible to suck the strength and the good wizards ), no time left. And where he happens to Max in the end - even less time to understand, because the starting superbitva.

Of course, then, as the protagonist kills Morgan - nothing but laughter does not cause. But somehow it was necessary to finish the film.

So it's crazy good family movie. You can watch all. Above all, her head off. But the film could easily take second place behind the Pirates in the list of Disney productions Bruckheimer.

---------------------------------.
Sign up. to update the blog with one click!. Read on Twitter!. ::. Advertising blog.

Criteria for seed investment from Dave McClure

From Denny's blog:. ... Linkedin. , In profile. CrunchBase. The section on him in his. Online. ). He is one of the Dons. PayPal Mafia. One of the chapters, which is a former resident of Kiev. Max Levchin. - For this informal organization are startups such as Linkedin, Youtube, FaceBook, Six Apart, Slide, Mint, and several dozen others ( including the internet was not a startup Tesla Motors).

So, this person has only a few criteria for the early financing of startups:.

a. By -product refers to a service running on a free or low-cost Open Source software that runs on a Claude or a low-cost engine, developed by a few months (and better for the weekend ), a small team of programmers, who are constantly testing it in real time on live users.
2. Most often, we mean a combination of marketing channels to promote online through paid or organic search traffic (SEM / SEO) search engine, with a viral / social component in the new media and social platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Youtube, and fast-growing mobile platforms iOS . Except for search engines, most of these channels, there are no more than five years, but now have from 100m to 500m users, with a low-budget and measurable marketing companies and even with a small team can easily get billions of users around the world.
3. Income can be easily collected by the various online payment instrumenov, and can be a price to pay for transactions, digital goods, payment for subscriptions, lead generation, CPM / CPC / CPA advertising.

What is interesting here? . You bet on a team of programmers (minimum cost), marketing of ... Say ... Instead, the chosen method of trial and error, live customer feedback. This suggests that startups have moved into the second stage of development. There is a classification in the works for the sale of services ( which are different from those of many goods and which are all start-ups ):.

1. 
   The first stage - do what meets the minimum requirements of consumers.
   


2. 
   The second stage - do what consumers want.
   


3. 
   The third stage - do what surpasses the imagination of consumers.
   

The second stage - this is a good product. It is at this stage is the internet and startups. And yet, how about creating what surpasses the imagination of consumers (such as Disney has created Disneyvorld from which all crazy )? .

Note: Working with Teenagers

' And what am I in love with you so? ' . A. On. Pushkin of Sarov.
Regularly read and about the association of adolescents in this library blogs. Biblio -S- traveler. and. Animals color of fire. Admired and wondered, how come they organize.

So how does it really?.

3 Warning Signs That Your Product Sucks

Performable. , founder of. Ghostery. ,. Lookery. and. Compete.
original.

How do I know if solves your startup. critical. problem?.

you can. interrogate your users. To conduct interviews with them, to. a / b tests. in order to get an answer. No matter what method you use, the opening of the reality - it is really hard, especially for entrepreneurs. ( see. Reality Distortion Field. I Don't Know. ).

I talked to. Joshua Porter. , My co-founder. Performable. Today, about one application that we use for internal problems and about how bad and confusing interface where. Despite this, we use this app every single day. And we are not alone - they have tens of thousands of customers.

Why do we continue to use it? . critical. problem. We need this tool for business, despite its shortcomings, this is the best we've ever tasted.



So how do you know that a product that makes your startup solve a critical problem? . years. trying to figure it out on the experience of several startups I start prosekaet the essence;).

If you did not once hear any of these comments, it is likely that. you do not decide the critical issue. :.

a. If you have made your application easier, I would have started to use it.

2. I'm really very busy, but will soon begin to use your application.

3. If your application was cheaper, I would have started to use it. (added. Josh. ).

Sound familiar? . stop now. reassess and make: whether to make the restructuring of your product / audience, to change the pricing, or to redirect the entire project.

Question: how do you figure out that your product is no use to anyone? .

Translated for the blog. dennydov. blogspot. com.
Eugenia Dudnik.

Permission is granted to copy this material, indicating a hyperlink to the source:. dennydov. blogspot. com.

It was?

At a meeting on the results of 2011. branch library number 2 has presented his work as a videovospominany.

Librarian second branch of Love Koshkin congratulations on the birth of his daughter Lisa! .

Forward to the past, what looked on YouTube in 2011

That leaves 2011! . And what will happen in 100 years, when our great-great- great-grandchildren will want to see what their ancestors were interested in the last century, what will they think of us? . Google.

on page. YouTube. com / Rewind. You can find a selection of the most popular videos and events that are watched people around the world in 2011.